User Tools

Site Tools


category_of_all_partitions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
category_of_all_partitions [2019/03/03 09:10]
d.gromada
category_of_all_partitions [2021/11/23 11:56] (current)
Line 5: Line 5:
 ==== Partitions ==== ==== Partitions ====
  
-Let $k,​l\in\mathbb{N}_0$,​ by a **partition** of $k$ upper and $l$ lower points we mean a partition of the set $\{1,​\dots,​k\}\sqcup\{1,​\dots,​l\}\approx\{1,​\dots,​k+l\}$,​ that is, a decomposition of the set of $k+l$ points into non-empty disjoint subsets, called **blocks**. The first $k$ points are called **upper** and the last $l$ points are called **lower**. The set of all partitions on $k$ upper and $l$ lower points is denoted $\Pscr(k,​l)$. We denote the union $\Pscr:​=\bigcup_{k,​l\in\N_0}\Pscr(k,​l)$.+Let $k,​l\in\mathbb{N}_0$,​ by a [[partition|partition]] ​of $k$ upper and $l$ lower points we mean herre a partition of the set $\{1,​\dots,​k\}\sqcup\{1,​\dots,​l\}\approx\{1,​\dots,​k+l\}$,​ that is, a decomposition of the set of $k+l$ points into non-empty disjoint subsets, called **blocks**. The first $k$ points are called **upper** and the last $l$ points are called **lower**. The set of all partitions on $k$ upper and $l$ lower points is denoted $\Pscr(k,​l)$. We denote the union $\Pscr:​=\bigcup_{k,​l\in\N_0}\Pscr(k,​l)$.
  
 We illustrate partitions graphically by putting $k$ points in one row and $l$ points on another row below and connecting by lines those points that are grouped in one block. All lines are drawn between those two rows. We illustrate partitions graphically by putting $k$ points in one row and $l$ points on another row below and connecting by lines those points that are grouped in one block. All lines are drawn between those two rows.
Line 144: Line 144:
   - $T_{qp}=T_qT_p$ whenever one of the sides makes sense,   - $T_{qp}=T_qT_p$ whenever one of the sides makes sense,
   - $T_{p^*}=T_p^*$.   - $T_{p^*}=T_p^*$.
 +Note that the proposition is true only if the category parameter $\delta$ indeed coincide with the dimension $N$ of the $\C^N$ vector spaces.
  
-Consider the symmetric group $S_N$ and denote by $u$ its representation by permutation matrices. ​+Consider the symmetric group $S_N$ and denote by $u$ the representation ​of $S_N$ by permutation matrices. ​For any $k,​l\in\N_0$ denote the intertwiner spaces 
 +$$\FundRep_{S_N}(k,​l):​=\Rep_{S_N}(u^{\otimes k},​u^{\otimes l}):​=\{T\colon(\C^N)^{\otimes k}\to(\C^N)^{\otimes l}\mid Tu^{\otimes k}=u^{\otimes l}T\}.$$
  
-==== Tannaka–Krein duality ​====+**Proposition.** It holds that 
 +$$\FundRep_{S_N}(k,​l)=\{T_p\mid p\in\Part(k,​l)\}.$$ 
 +That is, the functor $T$ maps the category of partitions $\Part$ to the category generated by the fundamental representation $u$. 
 + 
 +So the category of all partitions can be used to model the representation theory of the symmetric group. Note however that the functor $T$ is //not// injective, so it does not provide a category isomorphism. 
 + 
 +Note that this result can be also understood as a generalization of the [[Schur–Weyl duality|Schur–Weyl duality]]. 
 + 
 +==== Completing the category ​====
  
  
  
category_of_all_partitions.1551604243.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/11/23 11:56 (external edit)