User Tools

Site Tools


compact_quantum_group

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
compact_quantum_group [2019/10/01 10:54]
d.gromada
compact_quantum_group [2021/11/23 11:56] (current)
Line 73: Line 73:
 Let $\pi$ be the [[wp>​Gelfand–Naimark–Segal_construction|GNS representation]] of $C(G)$ corresponding to the Haar state $h$. We denote by $L^2(G)$ the corresponding Hilbert space. It holds that the Haar state $h$ is //​faithful//​ on $\Pol(G)$ (i.e. $h(aa^*)=0\Leftrightarrow a=0$). Hence, $\pi$ provides a faithful representation of $\Pol(G)$ on $L^2(G)$. Let $\pi$ be the [[wp>​Gelfand–Naimark–Segal_construction|GNS representation]] of $C(G)$ corresponding to the Haar state $h$. We denote by $L^2(G)$ the corresponding Hilbert space. It holds that the Haar state $h$ is //​faithful//​ on $\Pol(G)$ (i.e. $h(aa^*)=0\Leftrightarrow a=0$). Hence, $\pi$ provides a faithful representation of $\Pol(G)$ on $L^2(G)$.
  
-Conversely, for any Hopf $*$-algebra with a positive integral $A_0$, we can consider its universal C*-completion (see bellow) $A:​=C^*(A_0)$,​ which defines a compact quantum group. This provides an alternative //​algebraic//​ definition of compact quantum groups.+Conversely, for any Hopf $*$-algebra with a positive integral $A_0$, we can consider its universal C*-completion (see below) $A:​=C^*(A_0)$,​ which defines a compact quantum group. This provides an alternative //​algebraic//​ definition of compact quantum groups.
  
 ==== The universal C*-algebra ==== ==== The universal C*-algebra ====
Line 130: Line 130:
 Similarly as above, any (unitary) representation of $\hat G$ induces a ($*$-)representation of the algebra $\Pol G$. Indeed, take any $U\in l^\infty(\hat G)\otimes\B(H)$. We can decompose this element as a sum $U=\sum_{\alpha\in\Irr G}U^\alpha$,​ where $U^\alpha\in M_{n_\alpha}(\C)\otimes\B(H)$. Then, we can define $\pi_U\colon\Pol G\to\B(H)$ as $\pi_U(u_{ij}^\alpha):​=U_{ij}^\alpha$. Similarly as above, any (unitary) representation of $\hat G$ induces a ($*$-)representation of the algebra $\Pol G$. Indeed, take any $U\in l^\infty(\hat G)\otimes\B(H)$. We can decompose this element as a sum $U=\sum_{\alpha\in\Irr G}U^\alpha$,​ where $U^\alpha\in M_{n_\alpha}(\C)\otimes\B(H)$. Then, we can define $\pi_U\colon\Pol G\to\B(H)$ as $\pi_U(u_{ij}^\alpha):​=U_{ij}^\alpha$.
  
 +===== Finite quantum groups =====
  
 +A compact quantum group is called **finite** if the associated C*-algebra $C(G)$ is finite-dimensional. In this case, all other associated algebras coincide, so
 +$$L^\infty(G)=C_{\rm u}(G)=C(G)=C_{\rm r}(G)=\Pol G.$$
 +
 +The same hence holds for the dual algebras, which are also finite-dimensional
 +$$\C^{\hat G}=l^\infty(\hat G)=c_0(\hat G)=c_{00}(\hat G).$$
 +In particular, those algebras are unital C*-algebras and hence define a finite compact quantum group $\hat G=(c_0(\hat G),​\hat\Delta)$. A finite quantum version of the Pontryagin duality then says that $\hat{\hat G}=G$.
 +
 +In particular, any compact quantum group that is finite is also discrete (i.e. a dual of a compact one). In the formalism of locally compact quantum groups, one can formulate also the converse statement. If a locally compact quantum group is compact and discrete, then it is finite. Indeed, //​discreteness//​ means that the associated reduced C*-algebra is of the form $c_0(G)=\bigoplus_\alpha M_{n_\alpha}(\C)$. The //​compactness//​ then means that this C*-algebra is unital, which implies that the direct sum has to be finite.
  
 ===== Further reading ===== ===== Further reading =====
compact_quantum_group.1569927270.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/11/23 11:56 (external edit)