Recall that for an ordinary group , its subgroup is a subset
which is closed under the group operation. However, for abstract groups, the notion of a subset may not always be well defined. In that case, we say that
is a subgroup of
if there is some injective group homomorphism
embedding
. Specifying the form of the embedding is then an important datum. In contrast, in the case of matrix groups, we usually use the former strict definition – the embedding
ought to be the identity. Similar distinction occurs for quantum groups.
Let be compact quantum groups. We say that
is a quantum subgroup of
if there is a surjective
-homomorphism
satisfying
. The surjective
-homomorphism
then dualizes the embedding
.
In the matrix case, we usually compare the quantum groups with respect to their fundamental representations. That is, suppose that and
are compact matrix quantum group and
and
their respective fundamental representations. We say that
is a quantum subgroup of
, denoted
, if the map
extends to a surjective
-homomorphism
.
Suppose are compact matrix quantum groups with unitary fundamental representations. Then the following are equivalent.
Let be a Hopf
-algebra. A set
is called a coideal if
A coideal that is also a (-)ideal is called a *-biideal. A Hopf (*-)ideal is a (
-)biideal that is invariant under the antipode, that is,
. For any Hopf
-algebra
and a Hopf
-ideal
the quotient~
becomes a~Hopf
-algebra with respect to the operations induced from
.
Given compact quantum groups , the corresponding surjection
defines a Hopf
-ideal
and
. Conversely, given a compact quantum group
, any Hopf
-ideal
defines a compact quantum subgroup
such that
.
Let be a compact quantum group and denote by
its discrete dual. Suppose that
is a Hopf
-subalgebra. Then
actually defines a compact quantum group
and a discrete quantum group
. We say that
is quotient quantum group of
and that
is a discrete quantum subgroup of
.
Let be a~compact quantum group and
its quotient. Then
is a full subcategory of
. More concretely,
consists of all representations
such that
.
In particular, we have . More precisely,